FF Logo
Hello Guest | Login | Register
Latest reviews
Who's online?
0 users and 86 guests
Pages: [1 2]
Users Avatar
2kool4skool
Posts: 172
Joined: June 5, 2011, 3:30

0
(Y)

Posted: December 24, 2015, 4:43 Post #18
Quoting Haze202
no there won't be a pass and no a faction noobs won't have rcon

Posted Image

Censored: It illustrates how that position is commonly used to defend racist ideals [ad hominem (guilt by association)]. As a result, no matter the original intent, the impact is the same¹ [just lol at your allowing people to sexually harass and threaten without repercussion]. I'm not arguing about this any further, but far right/fascist/racist ideals are not going to be allowed on our community [seems to be a strawman], nor will arguments [like mildly ridiculing the far left] that are commonly known to be used to defend those ideals as valid [since far right xenophobes hate Islam should atheist critiques of Islam be banned?]

Just lol at his lack of ethics to ban me for humbly thinking his arguments were not rational and for ¹pointing out the implications he made of infantilizing people in which he was not intellectually honest that it was a safe space.

For the record I did accept his rules but I thought they were kind of dishonest.
Users Avatar
digi
Posts: 403
Joined: September 11, 2009, 17:01

0
(Y)

Posted: December 27, 2015, 2:41 Post #19
Users Avatar
2kool4skool
Posts: 172
Joined: June 5, 2011, 3:30

0
(Y)

Posted: December 27, 2015, 10:09 Post #20
Posted Image

Censored: It illustrates how that position is commonly used to defend racist ideals [ad hominem (guilt by association)]. As a result, no matter the original intent, the impact is the same¹ [just lol at your allowing people to sexually harass and threaten without repercussion]. I'm not arguing about this any further, but far right/fascist/racist ideals are not going to be allowed on our community [seems to be a strawman], nor will arguments [like mildly ridiculing the far left] that are commonly known to be used to defend those ideals as valid [since far right xenophobes hate Islam should atheist critiques of Islam be banned?]

Just lol at his lack of ethics to ban me for humbly thinking his arguments were not rational and for ¹pointing out the implications he made of infantilizing people in which he was not intellectually honest that it was a safe space.

For the record I did accept his rules but I thought they were kind of dishonest.
Users Avatar
ice
Posts: 132
Joined: November 11, 2010, 5:03

0
(Y)

Posted: December 27, 2015, 17:54 Post #21
Rally is in 1 hour! :D

NukeTown For RF bra!

Visit RFrun.net for Deathrun Related things!
Users Avatar
[Deleted User]
Posts: N/A
Joined: N/A

0
(Y)

Posted: December 27, 2015, 22:06 Post #22
rally was a fail we didn't reach 32 players not even close, we peaked at 19 (1 browser)
i recorded all of it but no real point uploading as it was just like a typical game

Users Avatar
2kool4skool
Posts: 172
Joined: June 5, 2011, 3:30

0
(Y)

Posted: December 27, 2015, 22:59 Post #23
Quoting Haze202
rally was a fail we didn't reach 32 players not even close, we peaked at 19 (1 browser)
i recorded all of it but no real point uploading as it was just like a typical game


it was like 22 players right before the crash, wasn't it?
Edited by 2kool4skool at December 27, 2015, 23:13

Censored: It illustrates how that position is commonly used to defend racist ideals [ad hominem (guilt by association)]. As a result, no matter the original intent, the impact is the same¹ [just lol at your allowing people to sexually harass and threaten without repercussion]. I'm not arguing about this any further, but far right/fascist/racist ideals are not going to be allowed on our community [seems to be a strawman], nor will arguments [like mildly ridiculing the far left] that are commonly known to be used to defend those ideals as valid [since far right xenophobes hate Islam should atheist critiques of Islam be banned?]

Just lol at his lack of ethics to ban me for humbly thinking his arguments were not rational and for ¹pointing out the implications he made of infantilizing people in which he was not intellectually honest that it was a safe space.

For the record I did accept his rules but I thought they were kind of dishonest.
Users Avatar
[Deleted User]
Posts: N/A
Joined: N/A

0
(Y)

Posted: December 27, 2015, 23:25 Post #24
i did playercount command like every 2 minutes, it never went higher than 19 and that was with heats browser
Edited by N/A at December 27, 2015, 23:25

Users Avatar
nick
Posts: 158
Joined: September 11, 2009, 17:10

0
(Y)

Posted: December 28, 2015, 3:51 Post #25
rip rally

Posted Image

Users Avatar
2kool4skool
Posts: 172
Joined: June 5, 2011, 3:30

likes this
(Y)

Posted: December 28, 2015, 4:17 Post #26
Quoting nick
rip rally

Posted Image

Posted Image

Censored: It illustrates how that position is commonly used to defend racist ideals [ad hominem (guilt by association)]. As a result, no matter the original intent, the impact is the same¹ [just lol at your allowing people to sexually harass and threaten without repercussion]. I'm not arguing about this any further, but far right/fascist/racist ideals are not going to be allowed on our community [seems to be a strawman], nor will arguments [like mildly ridiculing the far left] that are commonly known to be used to defend those ideals as valid [since far right xenophobes hate Islam should atheist critiques of Islam be banned?]

Just lol at his lack of ethics to ban me for humbly thinking his arguments were not rational and for ¹pointing out the implications he made of infantilizing people in which he was not intellectually honest that it was a safe space.

For the record I did accept his rules but I thought they were kind of dishonest.
Users Avatar
nick
Posts: 158
Joined: September 11, 2009, 17:10

likes this
(Y)

Posted: December 28, 2015, 4:23 Post #27
yo gif game is unreal

Users Avatar
2kool4skool
Posts: 172
Joined: June 5, 2011, 3:30

0
(Y)

Posted: December 30, 2015, 5:39 Post #28
Quoting clockwise
Posted Image

Posted Image

Censored: It illustrates how that position is commonly used to defend racist ideals [ad hominem (guilt by association)]. As a result, no matter the original intent, the impact is the same¹ [just lol at your allowing people to sexually harass and threaten without repercussion]. I'm not arguing about this any further, but far right/fascist/racist ideals are not going to be allowed on our community [seems to be a strawman], nor will arguments [like mildly ridiculing the far left] that are commonly known to be used to defend those ideals as valid [since far right xenophobes hate Islam should atheist critiques of Islam be banned?]

Just lol at his lack of ethics to ban me for humbly thinking his arguments were not rational and for ¹pointing out the implications he made of infantilizing people in which he was not intellectually honest that it was a safe space.

For the record I did accept his rules but I thought they were kind of dishonest.
Users Avatar
URDONE4
Posts: 4
Joined: February 20, 2013, 2:40

0
(Y)

Posted: December 30, 2015, 15:25 Post #29
These gifs are annoying as fuck.

Users Avatar
digi
Posts: 403
Joined: September 11, 2009, 17:01

0
(Y)

Posted: December 30, 2015, 22:14 Post #30
Quoting clockwise
Quoting 2kool4skool
Quoting clockwise
Posted Image

Posted Image



Posted Image


Posted Image

Users Avatar
2kool4skool
Posts: 172
Joined: June 5, 2011, 3:30

0
(Y)

Posted: December 30, 2015, 23:26 Post #31
Quoting URDONE4
These gifs are annoying as fuck.

Posted Image

At least mine are good.

Clockwise posted a gif of some random subhuman twice. That's the best he could do.

Posted Image
Edited by 2kool4skool at December 30, 2015, 23:31

Censored: It illustrates how that position is commonly used to defend racist ideals [ad hominem (guilt by association)]. As a result, no matter the original intent, the impact is the same¹ [just lol at your allowing people to sexually harass and threaten without repercussion]. I'm not arguing about this any further, but far right/fascist/racist ideals are not going to be allowed on our community [seems to be a strawman], nor will arguments [like mildly ridiculing the far left] that are commonly known to be used to defend those ideals as valid [since far right xenophobes hate Islam should atheist critiques of Islam be banned?]

Just lol at his lack of ethics to ban me for humbly thinking his arguments were not rational and for ¹pointing out the implications he made of infantilizing people in which he was not intellectually honest that it was a safe space.

For the record I did accept his rules but I thought they were kind of dishonest.
Users Avatar
[Deleted User]
Posts: N/A
Joined: N/A

0
(Y)

Posted: January 9, 2016, 0:42 Post #32
I would be more interested in a CTF rally, so I didn't bother to go to this one

Users Avatar
digi
Posts: 403
Joined: September 11, 2009, 17:01

0
(Y)

Posted: January 9, 2016, 22:33 Post #33
didn't miss much

Pages: [1 2]

© 2009-2019 Faction Files

Page generated in 0.032 seconds